Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: New Mexico WIPP leaking plutonium in atmosphere

  1. #1

    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Posts
    14
    Thanks
    0
    Been Thanked: 3 Times

    Default New Mexico WIPP leaking plutonium in atmosphere

    Collected all the data I found in couple days.

    It does not look and the officials do not seems to know how much the release is and what is hepning ATM inside the facility.

    I would suggest to stay indoors if you live nearby, just as precaution. No fear-mongering, just basic sense of reasoning.

    justpaste.it/ejs9

    .. sorry I bypassed the HTML limit. I will make my posts here later, since I do grow cannabis and have done this almost 10 years. This issue is so important and acute I have to break the rules now with this.

  2. #2
    mellowed Guest

    Default

    great first post on the forum

  3. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to mellowed For This Useful Post:

    Bob2142 (02-03-14), Goodbuddy (28-02-14)

  4. #3

    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Posts
    14
    Thanks
    0
    Been Thanked: 3 Times

    Default

    On 28. day they changed their statement into " likely at very low levels ". Also now the original three weeks have changed into many months to stop the leak. There is no statement what caused the leak and what is the status of the nuclear accident.

    New test results reveal that the air filter "my have not been working". The gov is busted for lying the leak!

    CEMRC Ambient Air Sampling Results (pdf), Feb. 27, 2014:

    109 Yards NW of WIPP Exhaust Shaft — Sample time Feb. 11-18

    Pu239+240: 0.115 Bq per sample [39 times the highest activity ever detected since testing began in 1997, which was 0.004 Bq per sample]
    Pu238: 0.004 Bq per sample [Never detected since testing began in 1997]
    Am241: 1.3 Bq per sample [2600 times the highest activity ever detected since testing began in 1997, which was 0.0005 Bq per sample]"CEMRC director Russell Hardy discussed the normal levels during the resident meeting earlier this week in Carlsbad: “I just want to reiterate, normally we do see ‘0’. For my radio-chemists, ‘0’ is not good enough. I don’t know how they balance a check book, because they don’t stop until they get to eight zeroes past the decimal point — that’s normally what we see.”This means a normal reading is at most 0.000000009 Bq per sample — making the recent Pu239+240 sample equal to 12,777,778 times higher than normal, and the Am241 sample 144,444,444 times normal levels."


    Corporate media states, that these facts "spark conspiracy theories." I just wonder, what really here is a conspiracy when the gov is busted for lying all the time? It really isnt a big secret anymore, what game they play.



    1.3. comes out new info, these quotes are surprisingly from corporate media which now seems to be taking this issue into publicity:

    "Investigators now admit that the problem is serious […] a container of radioactive waste leaked underground at the WIPP [...] they admit it’s too soon to tell how dangerous it could be for those exposed. […] A piece of salt is believed to have fallen from a cavern ceiling and crushed drums of waste [...] the most likely scenario is that a huge chunk of salt fell from the ceiling and ruptured a drum or multiple drums of waste. [...] Nobody knows exactly what happened. That’s one of the strange things about this [...] Unfortunately, nobody can go underground to find out what’s happened. [...] plutonium and americium, which if lodged in the body bombards internal organs with subatomic particles for the rest of the person’s lifetime."

    Also the gov is now "re-analyzing" the samples. I think they are just playing time. Soon they will say "they are very sorry" like TEPCO when their measurements were "acidentally" ten or hundred folds wrong.

  5. #4

    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Posts
    14
    Thanks
    0
    Been Thanked: 3 Times

    Default

    OK now this is interesting piece of evidence. Seems like they ordered 1200 radiation suits to Albuquerque on Feb 20.

    It seems they know very well how bad the situation is at WIPP.. Too bad they dont want to tell you but are preparing for the worse themself!

    fbo.gov/index?s=opportunity&mode=form&id=d90ce60b83f6ee744 72ac9f02a174096&tab=core&_cview=0

    Also now it is instead "no danger" of this: "the department is not 100 percent certain, but is pretty sure the surrounding population centers are safe."

    Pretty sure? They say their priority is to protect the peope. Then why they dont tell people to stay indoors when its confirmed that plutonium is leaking out of the facility? Instead, they are only protecting the industry and lying!

  6. #5

    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Posts
    14
    Thanks
    0
    Been Thanked: 3 Times

    Default

    Shit just got real:

    i.imgur.com/cF8ZADa.jpg

    Source: netc.com/

  7. #6

    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    514
    Thanks
    2,595
    Been Thanked: 550 Times

    Default

    Ah Mexico, where the criminals steal vans loaded with radioactive waste then get a rather unhealthy dose of radiation.

    Karma works fast in Meh-heho

  8. #7

    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Posts
    14
    Thanks
    0
    Been Thanked: 3 Times

    Default

    New monitors go into alarm.

    And this isnt funny. Unless you are evil person.



    i.imgur.com/hri1GWi.jpg

  9. #8

    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Posts
    14
    Thanks
    0
    Been Thanked: 3 Times

    Default

    bumb

    enenews.com/experts-wipp-nuclear-dump-could-be-closed-permanently-facility-ruined-for-good-by-kitty-litter-govt-may-never-stabilize-hundreds-of-nuclear-waste-drums-at-site-that-risk-exploding-audio

    enenews.com/officials-now-admit-over-500-barrels-of-nuclear-waste-at-risk-of-bursting-open-new-mexico-sees-imminent-danger-state-orders-wipp-to-prevent-health-or-environmental-threat

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  


THCtalk.com Disclaimer - You must be over 18 years old to view/use this site .THCtalk.com does not encourage growing Cannabis or possessing Cannabis. Learning how to grow Cannabis instructions should be for educational purposes only. All Information contained in this web site is for: Historical reference, Scientific reference and Educational purposes only. Visitors to this website are advised against breaking the law as It is illegal to smoke, grow, or possess cannabis in the UK and some US States